<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strangeparty &#187; Music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.strangeparty.com/tag/music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.strangeparty.com</link>
	<description>A blog about life, linux and photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Not X-Factor for Xmas No 1&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.strangeparty.com/2009/12/14/not-x-factor-for-xmas-no-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strangeparty.com/2009/12/14/not-x-factor-for-xmas-no-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Piatek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xfactor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangeparty.com/?p=597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>So, some of you may have heard of the campaign for getting Rage Against the Machine to no1 in the UK charts for Christmas.</p> <p>If you want to take part, have a look at the Facebook page for where you can buy a digital download of the track &#8220;Killing In The Name Of&#8221;</p> <p>Now, part <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.strangeparty.com/2009/12/14/not-x-factor-for-xmas-no-1/">Not X-Factor for Xmas No 1&#8230;</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, some of you may have heard of the campaign for getting Rage Against the Machine to no1 in the UK charts for Christmas.</p>
<p>If you want to take part, have a look at the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2228594104">Facebook</a> page for where you can buy a digital download of the track &#8220;Killing In The Name Of&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, part of me thinks this is great, lets get a real band to christmas number one (I don&#8217;t think I can remember what the last *real* band to do so was once you ignore all the Xfactor winners, tellytubbies and bob-the-builders). Another part of me thinks that perhaps this is just a publicity stunt for Rage Against the Machine. It is a real shame the band did not decide to give all money they got this week to charity!</p>
<p>Another part of me wonders if this is a bit of a social experiment, to see if the internet is more popular and influential than Simon Cowell and XFactor&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>*Edit 17th Dec*</strong></p>
<p>Interview on Radio 5:</p>
<p><strong><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="350" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GiiQPqmYE1A&amp;feature" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="350" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GiiQPqmYE1A&amp;feature"></embed></object></strong></p>
<p>Apparently Rage Against of the Machine are giving &#8220;the windfall&#8221; of proceeds from Killing in the name of to <a href="http://www.shelter.org.uk">shelter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strangeparty.com/2009/12/14/not-x-factor-for-xmas-no-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon UK online music store opens</title>
		<link>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/12/06/amazon-uk-online-music-store-opens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/12/06/amazon-uk-online-music-store-opens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 18:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Piatek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangeparty.com/?p=436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Amazon UK recently launched their online music store, which seemed top open much quieter than I would have expected. It did make national radio (Radio 1) on my way home from work, however they were more interested in the fact that albums are £3 each (I think this is  promotional price) than the fact it <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/12/06/amazon-uk-online-music-store-opens/">Amazon UK online music store opens</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon UK recently launched their <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/MP3-Music-Download/b/ref=topnav_storetab_dmusic?ie=UTF8&amp;node=77197031">online music store</a>, which seemed top open much quieter than I would have expected. It did make national radio (Radio 1) on my way home from work, however they were more interested in the fact that albums are £3 each (I think this is  promotional price) than the fact it is DRM free.</p>
<p>My biggest problem with iTunes (apart from the fact the iTunes software doesn&#8217;t run on linux) is that the files are DRM protected. This means I cannot play them on linux, and cannot play them on any portable player other than my iPod. Amazon&#8217;s music is mp3, DRM-free and will play on nearly all devices, all operating systems and I can even burn a mp3 (or normal audio cd) of songs to play elsewhere.</p>
<p>I seem to remember Apple trying to go DRM-free but the music companies objected (mind you, the music companies also wanted Apple to increase prices) but that doesn&#8217;t seem to have affected Amazon.</p>
<p>The radio news I was listening to suggested a price war resulting from this, however I am more interested in getting music I can actually play how and where I want.</p>
<p>As a side story, a friend recently had to get a new computer as their old one died. They got the music they had (windows WMA files, which were DRM protected) from the old disk, but had a hard time playing it. The new computer wasn&#8217;t allowed to play it! It took a lot of effort to get it working.</p>
<p>This is my biggest objection to DRM &#8211; It actually make things worse for the consumer, including making it harder to play and harder to backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/12/06/amazon-uk-online-music-store-opens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPod Classic with Amarok on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/05/29/ipod-classic-with-amarok-on-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/05/29/ipod-classic-with-amarok-on-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 12:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Piatek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Debian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amarok]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangeparty.com/?p=368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I first bought my iPod classic, Amarok hadn&#8217;t yet got support for the new SHA1 hashing that was being done in the song db. Then it was only in cvs, and while I remember compiling from source I don&#8217;t think I ever got round to running that code.</p> <p>Of course I found out the <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/05/29/ipod-classic-with-amarok-on-linux/">iPod Classic with Amarok on Linux</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first bought my iPod classic, Amarok hadn&#8217;t yet got support for the new SHA1 hashing that was being done in the song db. Then it was only in cvs, and while I remember compiling from source I don&#8217;t think I ever got round to running that code.</p>
<p>Of course I found out the hard way that Amarok didn&#8217;t have support for my iPod, and nearly bricked the thing. Thankfully a windows box and iTunes could reset it.</p>
<p>I now have it working, however it took a little fiddling. If you are trying to get it working, you absolutely must read <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Media_Device:IPod">http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Media_Device:IPod</a> before starting, especially <a href="http://amarok.kde.org/wiki/Media_Device:IPod#My_iPod_does_not_show_any_music">#My_iPod_does_not_show_any_music</a>, as this explains how to set up the magic ID number. Unfortunately earlier pages didn&#8217;t say whether to add the <strong>0x</strong> in from of the ID, and I remember having lots of difficulty just with libgpod and gtkpod. While I am mentioning it, the versions you need for an iPod Classic are: Amarok 1.4.8 and libgpod 0.6.0</p>
<p>So you have them installed, and you want to get Amarok managing your iPod &#8211; Well, I plugged it in, amarok detected it popped up a window asking if it should mount it as an iPod. I said yes, copied some songs, ejected it and BANG! &#8211; My iPod wouldnt show any songs.</p>
<p>It seems that the data uploaded by iTunes isn&#8217;t the same as by Amarok, and the iPod doesnt like that. Deleting the contents of the iPod_Control folder from the iPod seemed to make Amarok and the iPod happy. Of course Amarok needed to recreate some folder structure, but it asked nicely. Also, if you do this, don&#8217;t forget you have to recreate your SysInfo file again before Amarok uploads any songs.</p>
<p>Anyway, I now have an iPod that I can upload to with Linux (which is a hell of a lot faster than iTunes &#8211; iTunes took about 30 hours to copy ~30G of music, Amarok took about 3 hours), podcasts work and even some cover art has been copied.</p>
<p>If you have any problems, you can reboot the iPod by holding the Menu and select button down together for a few seconds. If the songs list comes up blank, then you have something wrong and Amarok didnt write the hash correctlty &#8211; check the SysInfo file, delete all music from the iPod in Amarok, and copy a few test tracks, disconnect and check if you have it right.</p>
<p>You can also use the <em>Smart Playlists</em> to sync to the iPod &#8211; <em>Favourite tracks</em>, <em>Newest tracks</em> and <em>All Collection</em> are good ones to use. Of course you can create your own custom smart playlists too.</p>
<p>Best of all, Amarok is properly multi-threaded so I can copy my entire music collection to my iPod, while playing music and Amarok and writing blog posts &#8211; on windows syncing an iPod used to make the system struggle, and iTunes became rather unresponsive&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/05/29/ipod-classic-with-amarok-on-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online music sharing</title>
		<link>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/03/04/online-music-sharing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/03/04/online-music-sharing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anton Piatek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nine inch nails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online. trent reznor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/03/04/online-music-sharing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>tech,blorge.com have  an article on Trent Reznor releaseing his new NIN album free online. Following RadioHead&#8217;s success with their online alblum, you can download the first 9 tracks for free, and have the rest as mp3&#8242;s for $5 &#8211; I have just downloaded the free tracks, if I like them then $5 is very cheap <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/03/04/online-music-sharing/">Online music sharing</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tech,blorge.com have  an <a href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2008/03/03/reznor-releases-new-nin-album-via-online-experiment/">article</a> on Trent Reznor releaseing his new NIN album free online. Following RadioHead&#8217;s success with their online alblum, you can download the first 9 tracks for free, and have the rest as mp3&#8242;s for $5 &#8211; I have just downloaded the free tracks, if I like them then $5 is very cheap for 36 songs. I will probably buy the $10 CD version, as $5 would make me feel cheap. I wonder who else will follow the trend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.strangeparty.com/2008/03/04/online-music-sharing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

